Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16272
Record ID: b89cb617-1962-4b7a-8b03-de8d6e5a1c17
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Presumptive arrest in partner assault: use of discretion and problems of compliance in the New Zealand Police |
Other Titles: | Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology |
Authors: | Newbold, Greg Cross, Jenny |
Keywords: | Policing |
Year: | 2010 |
Publisher: | Australian Academic Press : Samford Valley |
Citation: | 43 (1), April 2010 |
Notes: | Since pro-arrest policies in domestic violence became popular in the United States in the 1980s, numerous western countries have followed suit. In most cases, research has shown that implementation of the policies has fallen short of expectations, with arrest rates that are surprisingly low. In New Zealand, pro-arrest strategies have been employed since 1987 and results have been similar. This article argues that one of the reasons for noncompliance in New Zealand (and probably elsewhere), is that the complexities of domestic violence situations make pro-arrest difficult to apply in practice. Moreover, in order to protect themselves from official criticism for deviating from policy, in this study frontline police sometimes filed incomplete or inaccurate incident reports. This made it hard to determine exactly how well the policy was being implemented and whether or not it was working. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16272 |
ISSN: | 0004-8658 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.