Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16352
Record ID: c6b61017-2346-4fd9-a283-ad7dda529b6d
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Gailen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:25:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:25:24Z-
dc.date.issued1999en
dc.identifier.citation24 (2), April 1999en
dc.identifier.issn1037-969Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16352-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLegal Service Bulletin Co-operative Ltden
dc.subjectHomicideen
dc.titlePrivate violence, gendered justiceen
dc.title.alternativeAlternative law journalen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1744en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AltLJ/1999/12.htmlen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.description.notesJournal is supported by Faculty of Law, Monash University.<br/ >Contrasts the cases of Heather Osland, David Albion and Said Morgan, arguing that while all involved retaliatory private violence of some kind, the actions of the defendant in the latter cases were viewed as reasonable by the court because they were those of a male provoked to defend his family while the actions of the former were irrational because they were those of a battered woman. Discusses some the ways in which the legal system stereotypes and discriminates against women who kill and suggests that gender constructions are indeed integral to understanding intimate homicide as an act of self defence.en
dc.identifier.sourceAlternative Law Journalen
dc.date.entered2003-06-24en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing