Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16453
Record ID: 6784b0bd-534e-4992-aaac-22f5bd3b049a
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDocherty, Sharronen
dc.contributor.authorSandelowski, Margareteen
dc.contributor.authorEmden, Carolynen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:26:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:26:06Z-
dc.date.issued1997en
dc.identifier.citationVol. 20 ; pp. 365-371en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16453-
dc.description.abstract"There has been an accumulation of qualitative studies in recent years, but little cumulation of the understandings gained from them. Qualitative research appears endangered both by efforts to synthesize studies and by the failure to do so. Techniques used have included reciprocal translations of key metaphors and concepts and qualitative and quantitative comparative<br/ >analyses to produce narrative and theoretical integrations. The major problem yet to be resolved is developing usable and communicable systematic approaches to conducting<br/ >metasynthesis projects that maintain the integrity of individual studies."en
dc.languageenen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectQualitative methodsen
dc.subjectResearch methodologyen
dc.titleQualitative metasynthesis : issues and techniquesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid15365en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.identifier.sourceResearch in nursing & healthen
dc.date.entered2018-11-12en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing