Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16464
Record ID: 15065363-4a78-478b-8ba9-c9e029d3cd9f
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Frederick, Loretta | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:26:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:26:11Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | 46 (3), July 2008 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1531-2445 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16464 | - |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Association of Family and Conciliation Courts | en |
dc.subject | Legal issues | en |
dc.subject | Risk assessment | en |
dc.subject | Screening | en |
dc.subject | Family law | en |
dc.title | Questions about family court domestic violence screening and assessment | en |
dc.title.alternative | Family court review | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 629 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
dc.description.notes | General Overview:This North American article discusses the value of screening family court cases for domestic violence. The context to the article is the rising number of cases involving domestic violence within the court system, at a time of declining resources. The author identifies three key issues that need to be considered when designing and implementing screening processes: the definition of domestic violence used; the administration of the screening; and its impact on court processes and outcomes.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion:The first issue that needs to be resolved when implementing a triage process is how domestic violence will be defined. Screening may seek to detect: behaviours which fall under a legal definition of domestic violence; the context of the violence (including its purpose, meaning and effect); the risk of violence; and the existence of fear.<br/ ><br/ >A second consideration is how the screening process will be administered, including: whether it will be ongoing; what sources of information will inform the process (for example, the disputing parties, court files); and who will administer it (for example, court personnel, domestic violence advocates).<br/ ><br/ >The final set of questions to be considered when implementing screening relate to its impact on court processes and outcomes, such as: what level of evidence should trigger a positive screening result; how information obtained from the screening process should be used by the court; and what impact a positive screening result should have on the victims’ access to the courts and legal remedies.<br/ ><br/ >Ultimately, the author emphasises that the primary objective of screening should be to increase the safety of the victim and their children, including through risk assessment, safety planning and referrals. | en |
dc.identifier.source | Family court review | en |
dc.date.entered | 2010-02-26 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.