R v Leonboyer: the role of expert witnesses in psychological blow automatism cases

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16466

Record ID: 74a982c8-c864-40a0-b751-ecfea3f9fc8e

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wells, Helen	en
dc.contributor.author	Wilson, Paul	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:26:11Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:26:11Z	-
dc.date.issued	2002	en
dc.identifier.citation	9 (1), 2002	en
dc.identifier.issn	1321-8719	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16466	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.publisher	Australian Academic Press : Samford Valley	en
dc.subject	Mental health	en
dc.subject	Legal issues	en
dc.title	R v Leonboyer: the role of expert witnesses in psychological blow automatism cases	en
dc.title.alternative	Psychiatry, Psychology and Law	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	1208	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	National	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.description.notes	Outlines a domestic violence-related murder case and trial involving a psychiatric defence to murder, and criticises the role of expert witnesses in relation to this defence of ‘psychological blow automatism’ and the diagnosis itself.	en
dc.identifier.source	Psychiatry, psychology, and law	en
dc.date.entered	2005-05-23	en
dc.publisher.place	QLD	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing