Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16478 Record ID: c0d8bc68-74d6-447d-826b-3b5e09ae8783
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Johnson, MS | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, PH | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Rovi, S | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Washington, J | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Jacobs, A | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Vega, M | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Pan, KY | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:26:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:26:16Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 5 (5), Sep-Oct 2007 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1544-1709 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16478 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.subject | CALD (culturally and linguistically diverse) | en |
| dc.subject | Screening | en |
| dc.subject | Health | en |
| dc.title | Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Annals of family medicine | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 700 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.annfammed.org/content/5/5/430.full.pdf+html | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.description.notes | General Overview: This article reports on a US study designed to compare three methods of administering violence screening questionnaires in a primary care setting: the self-administered questionnaire, the medical staff interview and the medical practitioner interview.<br/ ><br/ >Methods: Using four urban family medicine practices with an ethnically diverse range of patients, a randomised trial of the 3 screening protocols was conducted. A total of 523 female patients over the age of 18 with a partner were assigned to one of the three protocols. Two brief screening tools were used: HITS (hurt-insult-threaten-scream) and WAST (Woman Abuse Screening Tool) - Short. Outcomes were determined using the measures of domestic violence disclosure, patient and practitioner comfort with the screening and time spent screening.<br/ ><br/ >Conclusions: A majority of both patients and health practitioners in an urban primary health care setting are comfortable with domestic violence screening. Self-administered questionnaires are as effective as medical practitioner interviews in terms of disclosure, comfort and time spent screening. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Annals of family medicine | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2009-05-12 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.