Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16488
Record ID: 51cb4507-5516-4932-909d-de338e5cd426
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Jessicaen
dc.contributor.authorEasteal, Patriciaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:26:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:26:20Z-
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.identifier.citationVol.: 23en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16488-
dc.formatPages 13-22en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleRape Mythology and the Criminal Justice System: A pilot study of sexual assault sentencing in Victoriaen
dc.title.alternativeACSSA Awareen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid11945en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://aifs.gov.au/resources/practice-guides/acssa-awareen
dc.subject.keywordLegalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordSexual abuseen
dc.description.notesBy examining sexual assault sentencing and judicial comments from a sample of mostly 2008 judgments in Victoria, this article explores differences in sentencing, focusing on the relationship between the perpetrator and the victim. The state of Victoria was chosen for the research because although Victorian sexual assault law and legal process has had the most progressive reforms, the only way to ensure these reforms are as effective and progressive as they seem, is to test their implementation with research. Our analysis suggests that although judges are demonstrating a better understanding of the reality of sexual assault in their discussion of mitigating and aggravating variables, this awareness is not translating into sentences.en
dc.identifier.sourceACSSA Awareen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.description.physicaldescriptionPages 13-22en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing