Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16571
Record ID: c148c39c-9bb5-4339-af82-868daa65bdb5
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGondolf, Edward Wen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:26:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:26:54Z-
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.identifier.citation10 (8), August 2004en
dc.identifier.issn1077-8012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16571-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectCross-culturalen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectCounsellingen
dc.titleRegional and cultural utility of conventional batterer counselingen
dc.title.alternativeViolence against womenen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1337en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesDiscusses the findings of a multi-site evaluation of conventional cognitive-behavioural counselling programmes in America for batterers and the preliminary findings of a trial of specialised counselling programme for African American men in the United States. Examines the question of whether mainstream services need to be adapted or diversified to accommodate cultural difference. The absence of previous research in this field is highlighted and some of the limitations of the studies conducted are identified. Concludes that, while some fundamental counselling principles may have relevance across cultural groups, the need for further adaptation of services and approaches remains an important issue for perpetrator intervention.en
dc.identifier.sourceViolence against womenen
dc.date.entered2004-11-22en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing