Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16576
Record ID: 43dd2d9b-121d-4ddc-a427-a6cb7eb7350a
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoodmark, Leighen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:26:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:26:59Z-
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16576-
dc.description.abstractThe Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is the signature federal legislative accomplishment of the anti-violence movement and has ensured that criminalization is the primary response to intimate partner violence in the United States. But at the time of its passage, some anti-violence activists, particularly women of color, warned that criminalization would be problematic for a number of reasons, a caution that has borne fruit in the 25 years since VAWA’s passage. This article critiques the effectiveness of criminalization as anti-domestic violence policy and imagines what a non-carceral VAWA could look like.<br/ ><br/ >Keywords VAWA, criminalization, non-carceralen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.relation.ispartofViolent against womenen
dc.titleReimagining VAWA: Why Criminalization Is a Failed Policy and What a Non-Carceral VAWA Could Look Likeen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220949686en
dc.identifier.catalogid16538en
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2020 August 27en
dc.date.entered2020-08-26en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2020 August 27en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing