Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16645 Record ID: c1d42a39-4599-4fdc-a98a-d459ec880f00
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Graycar, Reg | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Rhoades, Helen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Harrison, Margaret | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:27:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:27:25Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2001 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | (59), Winter 2001 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1030-2646 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16645 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Australian Institute of Family Studies | en |
| dc.subject | Family law | en |
| dc.title | Researching family law reform: the authors respond | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Family matters | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 1663 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.aifs.org.au/institute/pubs/fm2001/fm59/hr.pdf | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | National | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.description.notes | See also "The first three years of the Family Law Reform Act 1995" by Helen Rhoades et al. and "Researching the Family Law Reform Act: a case of selective attention?" by Lawrie Moloney on our Research & Resources database.<br/ >Please note that downloading the Pdf article from the Family Matters website is quite time-consuming and it is suggested that it be done one page at a time.<br/ >In November 2000, a report, researched and compiled by joint authors Helen Rhoades, Reg Graycar and Margaret Harrison, was published on the first three years of the Family Law Reform Act 1995, in order to evaluate its effectiveness and future implications. This article provides a response, from the report’s authors, to the criticisms and observations levelled at the report by Lawrie Moloney in his review article in this journal as well as by Professor Patrick Parkinson in a letter to this journal . The review suggests the report over-emphasises the role of domestic violence in family law and child contact matters and that the resulting picture it conveys is biased due to methodological flaws. The report authors’ response defends both their analysis and their methodology, whilst conceding the need for further research and greater communication and cooperation between legal and social welfare/ social science practitioners and academics. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Family matters | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2003-10-21 | en |
| dc.publisher.place | Melbourne | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.