Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16804
Record ID: d3ae87cf-ec01-4d5c-89ef-385a3bc6c2b8
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeyers, Marciaen
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Erinen
dc.contributor.authorLindhorst, Tarynen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:28:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:28:26Z-
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.citation14 (1), January 2008en
dc.identifier.issn1077-8012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16804-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.titleScreening for domestic violence in public welfare offices: an analysis of case manager and client interactionsen
dc.title.alternativeViolence against womenen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid3131en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesDespite a high prevalence of domestic violence among welfare clients, most studies of the implementation of the Family Violence Option (FVO) under welfare reform find that women rarely receive domestic violence services in welfare offices. This study reviews findings from current research on the factors that improve the likelihood that women will reveal their domestic violence experiences to service personnel, and uses the guidelines drawn from this review to evaluate domestic violence screening practices in welfare offices using 782 transcribed interviews between welfare workers and clients from 11 sites in four states. The analysis found that only 9.3% of case encounters involved screening for domestic violence. Screening rates differed by state, interview type, and length of worker employment. Qualitative analysis of the interviews showed that the majority of screening by workers was routinized or consisted of informing clients of the domestic violence policy without asking about abuse. Only 1.2% of the interviews incorporated at least two of the procedures that increase the likelihood of disclosure among domestic violence survivors, suggesting deeply inadequate approaches to screening for abuse within the context of welfare offices, and a need for improved training, protocol, and monitoring of FVO implementation.<br/ ><br/ >>[?2008 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit <a href=" http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal200837" target="_blank">SAGE Publications link</a>.]en
dc.identifier.sourceViolence against womenen
dc.date.entered2008-02-21en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing