Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16809
Record ID: 01f30d73-b283-48f6-8756-a0c192bd0739
Web resource: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33746396116&partnerID=40&md5=2c4236a5d52a31f803738b4ddb2a25e3
Type: Journal Article
Title: Screening for domestic violence: the 'evidence' dilemma
Other Titles: Contemporary nurse : a journal for the Australian nursing profession.
Authors: Webster, J
Year: 2006
Citation: No 2 Vol.: 21
Notes:  Initial calls for universal screening for domestic violence by health care workers date back over two decades (Hillard 1985). During the early 1990’s the agenda was subsequently driven by the introduction of medical and nursing guidelines supporting the procedure (Braham et al 1992, ACOG Technical Bulletin 1995). These guidelines provided a health related rationale for screening and screening methods and tools that were tailored for use in health care settings. Since that time and despite a general reluctance by health care providers, the momentum for routine screening has increased. This is partly because governments, both state and national, have made domestic violence prevention a major priority and have supported the introduction of screening programs into health care facilities (Webster 1994) and partly due to a changing cultural perception of domestic violence as both an important criminal and public health issue (Webster 1996).
Cited By (since 1996):2Export Date: 23 July 2013Source: Scopus
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16809
Physical description: Pages 163-164
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing