Web resource:	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-1442305203&partnerID=40&md5=7a042f47670c1d05fda3efb73f1d33d2
Type:	Journal Article
Title:	Screening for partner violence: direct questioning or self-report?
Other Titles:	Obstetrics and Gynecology
Authors:	Holt, V Webster, J
Year:	2004
Citation:	No 2 Vol.: 103
Notes:	OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a self-report checklist with a standard set of direct questions in identifying women who are experiencing domestic partner violence. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for evidence of positive partner violence for women attending the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital prenatal clinic between August and September 2002. RESULTS: Records (n = 1,596) were audited, and 937 (58.7%) contained both forms. The self-report check list identified a greater number of "cases" of partner violence (151) than the direct questions (66), with the level of agreement between the two instruments being only "fair" (Kappa coefficient.34). Each of the methods identified 7 cases of major abuse, which would have been missed if only 1 instrument had been used. All cases where women stated that they were afraid of their partner using the direct questions were also identified using the self-report checklist. CONCLUSION: A self-report checklist is an effective alternative to direct questioning in detecting women who are experiencing partner violence and is acceptable to women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3 Cited By (since 1996):22Export Date: 23 July 2013Source: Scopus
URI:	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16818
Physical description:	Pages 299-303
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.