Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16845
Record ID: c5783311-3a4b-4a05-aa15-d87575fc7e3a
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Aliceen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:28:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:28:42Z-
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.citation3, Spring 2007en
dc.identifier.issn1324-4264en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16845-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherDomestic Violence & Incest Resource Centreen
dc.subjectLegislation analysisen
dc.subjectTheories of violenceen
dc.subjectFamily lawen
dc.titleSeparating safety from situational violence: a response to the AIFS reporten
dc.title.alternativeDVIRC Quarterlyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid676en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesGeneral Overview: This article is a response to the report ‘Allegations of Family Violence and Child Abuse in Family Law Children’s Proceedings: A pre-reform exploratory study’ prepared by the Australian Institute of Family Studies.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion: The author comments on the findings and conclusions of the AIFS report in relation to the veracity of allegations, issues of safety for children, typology of violent behaviour, and the number of family violence cases as a proportion of total cases before the courts. The author concludes that the report provides evidence that challenges misconceptions and supports the call for different paths through the legal system for families where violence is alleged.en
dc.identifier.sourceDVIRC Quarterlyen
dc.date.entered2009-08-25en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing