Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16846
Record ID: 59fb00f5-875b-4740-9da7-8c8ee8ff0cde
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Aliceen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:28:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:28:42Z-
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.citationNo 77en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16846-
dc.formatPages 26en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleSeparating Safety from Situational Violence: Response to Allegations of Family Violence and Child Abuse in Family Law Children's Proceedings': A Pre-reform Exploratory Studyen
dc.title.alternativeFamily Mattersen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid11897en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordGrey liten
dc.description.notesThe research report 'Allegations of family violence and child abuse in child-related disputes in family law proceedings', published by the Australian Institute of Family Studies in 2007, provides evidence challenging a common myth that women frequently claim false allegations of family violence in child custody cases. Unfortunately, unless these allegations are accompanied by strong evidence, they will have little impact on post-separation child contact. This article discusses these findings, and the wider debate on whether courts should discriminate between different forms or severity of domestic abuse. The author argues that child and carer safety must be of paramount concern, requiring separate court pathways for cases involving domestic violence, and improved resources for assessment and support.en
dc.identifier.sourceFamily mattersen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.description.physicaldescriptionPages 26en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing