Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16977 Record ID: 8da1f7d1-0b2e-4378-83cb-fe48838d4e3a
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Pearson, Jessica | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Thoennes, Nancy | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:29:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:29:35Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2000 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 38 (1), January 2000 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0588-9774 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16977 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Association of Family and Conciliation Courts | en |
| dc.subject | Impact on children and young people | en |
| dc.subject | Family law | en |
| dc.title | Supervised visitation: the families and their experiences | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Family and conciliation courts review | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 1263 | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
| dc.description.notes | Now called Family Court Review (ISSN: 1531-2445)<br/ >This article describes the experiences of families receiving supervised visitation services as a result of a custody, visitation or family violence problems in the United States. Based on a review of agency files for 676 cases from one of four US programmes, interviews were also conducted with mothers, fathers, programme administrators, and judicial/legal personnel. Half of the families (48%) exited the programmes without formal closure. Families that dropped out had received fewer court hearings and evaluations. The family court is the dominant source of programme referrals (92% of cases). Visiting fathers are typically accused of domestic violence while visiting mothers (20%) are typically accused of substance abuse. More than three-quarters of both visiting and custodial parents said the anger of the other parent was a major reason for the referral, and most programme administrators believe families need other services or therapeutic interventions to exit or complement the supervision system, although intervention or assessment was not the norm. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Family and conciliation courts review | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2005-04-01 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.