Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17012
Record ID: 4c86bac5-2b41-402c-80f4-ce1bcbd20fef
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Fontes, Lisa A | en |
dc.contributor.author | Rogers, Michaela | en |
dc.contributor.author | Fisher, Colleen | en |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Parveen Azam | en |
dc.contributor.author | Allmark, Peter | en |
dc.coverage.spatial | International (including Australia) | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:29:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:29:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17012 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Technology-facilitated abuse (TFA) is a significant, harmful phenomenon and emerging trend in intimate partner violence. TFA encompasses a range of behaviours and is facilitated in online spaces (on social media and networking platforms) and through the misuse of everyday technology (e.g. mobile phone misuse, surveillance apps, spyware, surveillance via video cameras and so on). The body of work on TFA in intimate relationships is emerging, and so this scoping review set out to establish what types of abuse, impacts and forms of resistance are reported in current studies. The scoping review examined studies between 2000 and 2020 that focused on TFA within intimate partnerships (adults aged 18+) within the setting of any of these countries: the UK and Ireland, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus were searched in December 2020. A total of 22 studies were included in the review. The main findings were that TFA is diverse in its presentation and tactics, but can be typed according to the eight domains of the Duluth Power & Control Wheel. Impacts are not routinely reported across studies but broadly fall into the categories of social, mental health and financial impacts and omnipresence. Similarly, modes of resistance are infrequently reported in studies. In the few studies that described victim/survivor resistance, this was in the context of direct action, access to legal or professional support or in the identification of barriers to resistance. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Trauma, Violence, & Abuse | en |
dc.subject.other | Understanding victimisation and perpetration, and their impacts | en |
dc.title | Technology-facilitated abuse in intimate relationships: A scoping review | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221090218 | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 17286 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.subject.readinglist | General population | en |
dc.subject.readinglist | Technology-facilitated abuse | en |
dc.subject.readinglist | ANROWS Notepad 2022 May 26 | en |
dc.subject.readinglist | International (including Australia) | en |
dc.subject.readinglist | Understanding victimisation and perpetration, and their impacts | en |
dc.date.entered | 2022-05-19 | en |
dc.subject.list | ANROWS Notepad 2022 May 26 | en |
dc.subject.anratopic | Technology-facilitated abuse | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.