Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17013
Record ID: ae179acb-2162-442b-9f5f-22636453082c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Cynthiaen
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, Kelsey Len
dc.contributor.authorSanci, Lenaen
dc.coverage.spatialNationalen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:29:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:29:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.issn0747-5632en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17013-
dc.description.abstractResearch into technology-facilitated abuse in relationships (TAR) focuses predominantly on TAR prevalence and correlates. This study examines TAR impact (fear/distress), and multi-dimensional patterns of youth TAR victimisation. Using the 30-item TAR Scale (measuring the dimensions of Humiliation, Monitoring and Control, Sexual Coercion and Threats) we surveyed 527 youth (46.5% men, 52.8% women, 0.7% transgender/non-binary/agender) aged 16–24 years. The Multi-dimensional Humiliation Pattern, experienced by young men more than young women, had the highest impact of the patterns. The Multi-dimensional Sexual Coercion Pattern, experienced by young women more than young men, had a medium impact. The Multi-dimensional Monitoring, Control and Threats Pattern displayed gender equivalence and minimal impact. There were no significant differences between genders on impact of all Multi-dimensional TAR Patterns. However, for some individual behaviors in the Humiliation and Threats dimensions, young women reported greater impact than young men. We demonstrate that reporting of individual TAR behaviors, without examining multi-dimensional patterns of victimisation and impact, can result in erroneous reporting of TAR and obscure its gendered nature. These findings deepen the understanding of TAR as a phenomenon revealing an individual's overall experience of multiple dimensions of TAR, highlighting important directions for further research.<br/ ><br/ >Keywords: Digital dating abuse, Impact, Fear, Distress<br/ >Victimisation, Humiliationen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherScienceDirecten
dc.relation.ispartofComputers in Human Behavior Reportsen
dc.subjectTechnology-facilitated abuseen
dc.subject.otherUnderstanding victimisation and perpetration, and their impactsen
dc.titleTechnology-facilitated abuse in relationships: Victimisation patterns and impact in young peopleen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106897en
dc.identifier.catalogid16989en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.readinglistTechnology-facilitated abuseen
dc.subject.readinglistChildren and young people populationen
dc.subject.readinglistChildren and young peopleen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 October 19en
dc.subject.readinglistNationalen
dc.subject.readinglistUnderstanding victimisation and perpetration, and their impactsen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 June 15en
dc.date.entered2021-06-17en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 October 19en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 June 15en
dc.subject.anratopicChildren and young peopleen
dc.subject.anratopicTechnology-facilitated abuseen
dc.subject.anrapopulationChildren and young peopleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing