Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17209
Record ID: 8762943f-ec3c-4c72-b226-2f381a6dae4b
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNiolon, Phyllis Holditchen
dc.contributor.authorValle, Linda Anneen
dc.contributor.authorMatjasko, Jennifer Len
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:31:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:31:03Z-
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citation32 (1), Winter 2013en
dc.identifier.issn1520-6688en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17209-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen
dc.subjectPreventionen
dc.subjectLeaving/Stayingen
dc.subjectRisk factorsen
dc.subject.otherPreventionen
dc.titleThe role of economic factors and economic support in preventing and escaping from intimate partner violenceen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of Policy Analysis and Managementen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2591en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.readinglistPreventionen
dc.description.notesThis article in the Point/Counterpoint section of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management:aims to answer the following:<br/ >In their discussion, the authors assess each point in the context of the 3 types of intimate partner violence as defined by Michael P Johnson: intimate terrorism, violent resistance and situational couple violence. They suggest that future research on economic intervention policies should assess which of the three typologies are best targeted by that intervention to increase its chance of success.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Policy Analysis and Managementen
dc.date.entered2013-10-22en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing