Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17219
Record ID: 7e324d1c-e4c5-4779-bce5-0835f13d4388
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhelan, Herb Aen
dc.contributor.authorBhavsar Premalen
dc.contributor.authorHewitt, Lisa Nen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:31:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:31:07Z-
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citation70 (2), February 2011en
dc.identifier.issn0022-5282en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17219-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.titleThe secrets women keep: intimate partner violence screening in the female trauma patienten
dc.title.alternativeJournal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Careen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2893en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThis US-based study compared the results of two methods for screening women for intimate partner violence when presenting for treatment at a hospital for trauma care. The first method utilised three unscripted questions mandatorily conducted during the intake assessment by registered nurses. The second method used the partner violence screening (PVS) tool prior to discharge. The PVS was found to be more effective in identifying intimate partner violence. Other findings include 18% of patients did not receive the mandatory nurse screening.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Careen
dc.date.entered2011-04-28en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing