Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17222
Record ID: 2f8ba2fe-91c4-469a-b833-9595efc027f2
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorvan de Zandt, Piaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:31:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:31:08Z-
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citationNo 11 Vol.: 23en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17222-
dc.formatPages 100en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleThe sexual assault communications privilegeen
dc.title.alternativeJudicial Officers Bulletinen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid11893en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://search.informit.com.au.wwwproxy0.library.unsw.edu.au/documentSummary;dn=683713542772277;res=IELHSSen
dc.subject.keywordGrey liten
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.description.notesIn 1997 NSW became the first jurisdiction in Australia to specifically protect the confidentiality of the counselling records of complainants in sexual assault matters. A specific category of legal privilege was established to prevent the counselling records of sexual assault complainants from being used in a court unless the court was able to find that it was in the public interest to do so. The legislation is set out in the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 at Pt 5, Div 2.en
dc.identifier.sourceJudicial officers bulletinen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.description.physicaldescriptionPages 100en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing