Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17254
Record ID: 8c4de998-d160-4d43-ac27-0742f79dc112
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Robinen
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Heatheren
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:31:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:31:23Z-
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17254-
dc.description.abstractThe complaint narrative, in which victims describe their experiences of abuse as part of the domestic violence protection order application process, has been questioned on the basis that quality and outcome might vary depending on who completes the form. Using a mixed-methods narrative analysis approach, we advance this inquiry by examining whether distinct ‘types’ of narratives can be identified across a sample of protection order application narratives from the state of Queensland in Australia. We find three distinct narrative types that are differently associated with who makes the application and the protection order outcome. The results underscore the unevenness in the protection order process and equitable access to justice more broadly.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofThe British Journal of Criminologyen
dc.titleThe Whole Story: The Dilemma of the Domestic Violence Protection Order Narrativeen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz043en
dc.identifier.catalogid15678en
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.date.entered2019-12-20en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing