Understanding  intimate partner violence dynamics using mixed methods

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17309

Record ID: 0e12e56e-6a21-4068-a196-d1296b3abd73

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wood, Robert C	en
dc.contributor.author	Ferrer, Robert L	en
dc.contributor.author	Burge, Sandra K	en
dc.contributor.author	Katerndahl, David A	en
dc.contributor.author	Becho, Johanna	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:31:45Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:31:45Z	-
dc.date.issued	2012	en
dc.identifier.citation	30 (2), June 2012	en
dc.identifier.issn	1091-7527	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17309	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.publisher	American Psychological Association	en
dc.subject	Measurement	en
dc.subject	Theories of violence	en
dc.title	Understanding intimate partner violence dynamics using mixed methods	en
dc.title.alternative	Families, Systems, & Health	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	2645	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.subject.keyword	International	en
dc.description.notes	This article reports on the efficacy of mixed method studies (using both qualitative and quantitative data) in trauma research that focuses on the dynamics of intimate partner violence (IPV). The authors advocate the use of mixed method studies as a way to better appreciate the complexities of IPV. This position is grounded in the understanding that experiences of violence are heterogeneous; depending on a raft of social, cultural and other factors.	en
dc.identifier.source	Families, Systems, & Health	en
dc.date.entered	2013-02-11	en
dc.publisher.place	Washington, DC	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing