Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17345
Record ID: 5ecc1e81-10fc-4365-a7f8-0bf6b944092d
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDevi, Sharmilaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:32:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:32:00Z-
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citation379 (9815), February 11, 2012en
dc.identifier.issn0140-6736en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17345-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherJ. Onwhynen
dc.subjectPregnancyen
dc.subjectPolicyen
dc.subjectEarly interventionen
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.subjectChild protectionen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectStandardsen
dc.titleUS guidelines for domestic violence screening spark debateen
dc.title.alternativeThe lanceten
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid366en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThis brief article discusses the implication of US guidelines recommending that obstetricians and gynaecologists screen for intimate partner violence. Specifically, the author raises concerns about mandatory reporting laws interaction with screening and identification of domestic violence.en
dc.identifier.sourceThe lanceten
dc.date.entered2012-04-19en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing