Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17400
Record ID: 02cae46d-8f19-4bfd-ac17-5ddedf929fa0
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZibbell, Robert Aen
dc.contributor.authorDeutsch, Robin Men
dc.contributor.authorMcGill, Joseph Cen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:32:22Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:32:22Z-
dc.date.issued1999en
dc.identifier.citation37 (3), July 1999en
dc.identifier.issn0588-9774en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17400-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAssociation of Family and Conciliation Courtsen
dc.subjectFamily lawen
dc.titleVisitation and domestic violence: a clinical model of family assessment and access planningen
dc.title.alternativeFamily and conciliation courts reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1461en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesNow called Family Court Review (ISSN: 1531-2445)<br/ >Special Issue: Domestic Violence<br/ >Provides an overview of recent debate, in the United States, regarding allegations of domestic violence in the context of child custody and visitation disputes and some of the legal and policy issues that have emerged. Proposes a ‘decision tree’ method for assessing the role domestic violence should play in visitation disputes that includes recognition of the type, extent and effect of the violence, the factors contributing to its occurrence, the capacity of parents to care for children where abuse is an issue and the role of family and social systems in promoting and/or hindering the safety of children and spouses. Suggests that recommendations to the court should be based on both a thorough evaluation of these factors and some more general guiding principles, such as the primacy of child safety and the preference of the child to be cared for by the non-abusive parent.en
dc.identifier.sourceFamily and conciliation courts reviewen
dc.date.entered2004-07-06en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing