Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17423
Record ID: 2f098db0-cd29-4561-99ca-9ad6785d8ffe
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuzawa, Carl Gen
dc.contributor.authorBuzawa, Eve Sen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:32:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:32:31Z-
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citation32 (1), Winter 2013en
dc.identifier.issn1520-6688en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17423-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen
dc.subjectLeaving/Stayingen
dc.subjectPerpetrator programsen
dc.subjectPreventionen
dc.subjectRisk factorsen
dc.titleWhat does research suggest are the primary risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence (IPV) and what is the role of economic factors?en
dc.title.alternativeJournal of Policy Analysis and Managementen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2590en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesBuzawa and Buzawa believe an understanding of risk factors for intimate partner violence (IPV) is dependent on the nature of the abuse; the severity and frequency of abusive behavior; and the generality of violence and its psychopathology.<br/ ><br/ >In response to the question of how economic support would assist in the prevention of IPV, the authors suggest a variety of strategic approaches which would make most effective use of a limited budget. However, they feel that economic support would be only one of the determining factors in a victim’s decision to escape violence and would not be the most important one.<br/ ><br/ >Ultimately, they find economic factors to be a weak risk factor and their importance in controlling IPV to be hindered by the limited resources available to agencies and authorities.<br/ ><br/ >In discussing what has been learned from prior interventions, they examine the effectiveness of previously established interventions and their limitations. These include mandatory arrests, ‘no-drop’ prosecution policies and batterer intervention programs (BIPs).en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Policy Analysis and Managementen
dc.date.entered2013-10-22en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing