Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17467
Record ID: a9e557b9-8e4f-4b20-a237-b710ec15bc30
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarsden, Sallyen
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, Kelsey Len
dc.contributor.authorHumphreys, Cathyen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:32:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:32:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17467-
dc.description.abstractIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a complex and multifaceted problem gaining increasing attention within mental health research and practice. IPV explanations focus on both individual and systemic levels; however, it is increasingly acknowledged that a single level explanation may not be sufficient. The practices of clinical disciplines may, however, still privilege an explanation at one level over another, which will influence how they work with clients. It is likely that one such clinical group, psychologists, may play a critical role in helping victim-survivors to understand and explain their experiences of IPV. However, we were unable to find any studies focusing on women?s perceptions of psychologists? role in this. Additionally, we know little about women victim-survivors? perceptions of why their partners use IPV. To address these gaps, the research question for this study was: What explanations resonate during counseling for women in understanding their partner?s abuse? To explore this question, 20 women who had seen psychologists after experiencing IPV participated in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and three themes constructed from the data. The first two themes, narcissist description was helpful and not all bad all the time, showed that the women found it powerful in their healing processes when psychologists offered the opportunity to discuss their partners individual characteristics as explanations for their use of IPV. The third theme, structural explanations, showed that some of the women also reflected on wider structural contexts. Implications for clinical practice include the potential healing effect when practitioners can move along a continuum of explanation levels, covering both the inner and outer worlds. Implications for research into IPV perpetration are that women hold expertise and insight into individual perpetrators and could make valuable contributions to this field.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage journalsen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Interpersonal Violenceen
dc.titleWhy Does He Do It? What Explanations Resonate During Counseling for Women in Understanding Their Partner’s Abuse?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521989850en
dc.identifier.catalogid16796en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 February 11en
dc.date.entered2021-02-08en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 February 11en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing