Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17497
Record ID: e0d72a9b-37bf-4e85-8617-b93b8419915f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarey, Gemmaen
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Celiaen
dc.contributor.authorMalbon, Eleanoren
dc.contributor.authorHargrave, Jenen
dc.contributor.authorYates, Sophieen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:33:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:33:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 20, Issue 1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17497-
dc.description.abstractCare services in industrialized nations are increasingly moving towards individualized funding models, which aim to increase individuals’ flexibility, choice and control over their services and supports. Recent research suggests that such schemes have the potential to exacerbate inequalities, however none has explored gendered dimensions of inequality. The Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is a major individualized funding reform, and has a female participation rate of only 37%, despite women and girls making up half of the disability population.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherBMCen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal for Equity in Healthen
dc.titleWomen’s experiences of accessing individualized disability supports: Gender inequality and Australia’s National Disability Insurance Schemeen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01571-7en
dc.identifier.catalogid17126en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 November 16en
dc.date.entered2021-11-15en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 November 16en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing