Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17549
Record ID: a31e345a-87d4-4c28-8359-d6ebdf471a3e
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBouhours, Ben
dc.contributor.authorDaly, Ken
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:33:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:33:20Z-
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.citationNo 4 Vol.: 9en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17549-
dc.formatPages 371-394en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleYouth sex offenders in court: An analysis of judicial sentencing remarksen
dc.title.alternativePunishment and Societyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid12269en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34548653778&partnerID=40&md5=82b6fed18da821348002ad8cf3cbd74cen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesSexual offending by young people is increasingly viewed as a social problem that requires a strong response, but there is little research on the legal treatment of youthful sex offenders. On the one hand, these youths may be viewed as potential future sex offenders; on the other hand, because of their youth and immaturity they may be considered more reformable than adults and their behaviour more excusable. This article builds on an archival study of 385 sexual offence cases, which were disposed in court and by conference and formal caution, in South Australia from 1995 to 2001. Drawing on the transcripts of 55 cases sentenced by judges (i.e. the most legally serious offences), we analyse sentencing discourses and outcomes using both the explicit and latent content of the sentencing remarks. Specifically, we explore the judges' orientations and aims when sentencing adolescent sex offenders, how judges reconcile the seriousness of offending and the youthfulness of offenders and how they balance the competing interests of victims and offenders. Two major findings emerge. First, the cases fell in a three-way typology patterned by the victims' age, the context of the offence and the offender's criminal history. Second, our study suggests that while youth court judges consider sexual offending against children as very serious and are concerned by future offending, they do not adopt a punitive approach, but rather a therapeutic and rehabilitative perspective at sentencing. © 2007 SAGE Publications.<br/ >Cited By (since 1996):7Export Date: 23 July 2013Source: Scopusen
dc.identifier.sourcePunishment and societyen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.description.physicaldescriptionPages 371-394en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing