Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17935
Record ID: 03672bcf-8c0d-42aa-ab1c-470467d6f152
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mulla, Sameena | en |
dc.contributor.author | Hlavka, Heather R | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:36:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:36:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9781479809639 ((hardback ; : alk. paper)) | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9781479809660 ((paperback ; : alk. paper)) | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17935 | - |
dc.description.abstract | "This book reveals the human and social costs of sexual assault prosecution when courts rely on forensic science and medico-legal technologies that reproduce rape myths, inequality, and racial injustice under the guise of scientific authority"-- Provided by publisher. | en |
dc.format | pages cm | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | New York University Prerss | en |
dc.subject | Sex discrimination in criminal justice administration - United States | en |
dc.subject | Sex crimes - Law and legislation - United States | en |
dc.subject | Evidence, Criminal - United States | en |
dc.subject | Forensic sciences - United States | en |
dc.subject | Discrimination in criminal justice administration - United States | en |
dc.title | Bodies in evidence : race, gender, and science in sexual assault adjudication | en |
dc.type | text | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479809646 | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 17118 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
dc.subject.readinglist | ANROWS Notepad 2021 November 16 | en |
dc.identifier.lccn | 2021003072 | en |
dc.description.notes | <p>Uncovers how the process of sexual assault adjudication reinforces inequality and becomes a public spectacle of violence</p><p>For victims in sexual assault cases, trials rarely result in justice. Instead, the courts drag defendants, victims, and their friends and family through a confusing and protracted public spectacle. Along the way, forensic scientists, sexual assault nurse examiners, and police officers provide their insight and expertise, shaping the story that emerges for the judge and jury. These expert narratives intersect with the stories of victims, witnesses, and their communities to reproduce our cultural understandings of sexual violence, but too often this process results in reinscribing racial, gendered, and class inequalities.</p><p>Bodies in Evidence draws on observations of over 680 court appearances in Milwaukee County’s felony sexual assault courts, including interviews with judges, attorneys, forensic scientists, jurors, sexual assault nurse examiners, and victim advocates. It shows how forensic science helps to propagate public misunderstandings of sexual violence by bestowing an aura of authority to race and gender stereotypes and inequalities. Expert testimony reinforces the idea that sexual assault is physically and emotionally recognizable and always leaves material evidence. The court’s reliance on the presence of forensic evidence infuses these very familiar stereotypes and myths about sexual assault with new scientific authority.</p><p>Powerful, unflinching, and at times heartbreaking, Bodies in Evidence reveals the human cost of sexual assault adjudication, and the social cost we all bear when investing in forms of justice that reproduce inequality and racial injustice.</p> | en |
dc.date.entered | 2021-11-15 | en |
dc.description.contents | Introduction : Imagining and Witnessing Sexual Assault Adjudication -- Common Sense and the Nomos of Sexual Assault : Selecting and Sensitizing Jurors -- Permission to Speak : Testimony and the Spectacle of Suffering -- The Low and the High : Presumption, Power, and Police Expertise -- Nursing Sexual Violence from the Stand : Victimized and Victimizing Bodies -- The Evidence Does Not Speak for Itself : Performing Forensic Expertise -- The Good Father : Masculinity, Fatherhood, and Scenes of Admonishment -- Conclusion : Race, Place, and Subjugation in the Courts. | en |
dc.identifer.lccn | 2021003072 | en |
dc.subject.list | ANROWS Notepad 2021 November 16 | en |
dc.publisher.place | New York | en |
dc.description.physicaldescription | pages cm | en |
dc.identifier.carriertype | volume | en |
Appears in Collections: | Books |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.