Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/18321
Record ID: dbe2d1b1-0b6e-4c56-af2e-2fdf88d25a59
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Robinen
dc.contributor.authorMenghraj, Suzanneen
dc.contributor.authorDamiani, Cristinaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:38:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:38:32Z-
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/18321-
dc.format6pen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherVera Institute of Justiceen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectAdvocacyen
dc.subjectCross-culturalen
dc.subjectCALD (culturally and linguistically diverse)en
dc.titleEnhancing responses to domestic violence: promising practices from the Judicial Oversight Demonstration Initiative [brochure]en
dc.typeBookleten
dc.identifier.catalogid5946en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.vera.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/Enhancing_responses.pdfen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordBookleten
dc.subject.keywordElectronic publicationen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.description.notesThis brochure outlines the work of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration (JOD) Initiative, a project funded by the US Department of Justice’s Office on Violence Against Women since 1999, at 3 sites in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin; Washtenaw County, Michigan; and Dorchester District in Boston, Massachusetts.<br/ ><br/ >This initiative aims to improve criminal justice and community responses to domestic violence, by bringing together judges, attorneys, advocates for women, batterer intervention specialists, probation officers and the police, to enhance victim safety and the oversight of offenders.<br/ ><br/ >One of the JOD’s goals includes testing the effectiveness of combining strong judicial oversight of domestic violence cases with graduated sanctions for offenders and services for victims. Key highlights are enhancements to pre-trial and post-conviction responses, steps to improve cultural competency, and increased capacity through coordinated community efforts and information sharing.<br/ ><br/ >To enhance safety and accountability after conviction, the post-conviction compliance process, among one of the core achievements, comprises 4 components: judicial review hearings (series of post-conviction court appearances that extend the judge’s role in a case throughout the probationary period); intensive probation supervision (more field monitoring of offenders and increased contact with victims) to give judges detailed information about offender behaviour during the review period; mandated attendance for qualifying offenders at batterer intervention programmes; and improvements to court and community-based services for victims.<br/ ><br/ >It looks at the safety gap during the pre-trial period by hiring more staff to work with victims and witnesses, expediting victims’ access to protection orders and prosecuting bail breaches. At one site, some defendants (with a previous domestic violence record but who are not under the supervision of probation or parole) are ordered to the Pretrial Monitoring Program (PMP) as a condition of bail. Initiatives to reduce language and cultural barriers are also included.en
dc.date.entered2005-10-13en
dc.publisher.placeNew Yorken
dc.description.physicaldescription6 p.en
Appears in Collections:General Resources

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing