Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/20996
Record ID: a6646949-d228-45e6-8d74-199635c119ff
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBartholomew, Terryen
dc.contributor.authorMacKenzie, Rachelen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:56:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:56:52Z-
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/20996-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherPartnerships Against Domestic Violenceen
dc.publisherDept. of Family and Community Servicesen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectTheories of violenceen
dc.titleTargetting, constructing and evaluating intervention programs for men who are violent - a multi-level inquiry into current practice standardsen
dc.title.alternativeMen and relationships : partnerships in progress : Sydney, 20-21 November 2000en
dc.typeConference Paperen
dc.identifier.catalogid4647en
dc.subject.keywordConference paper/proceedingsen
dc.subject.keywordVictoriaen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordpaper/proceedingsen
dc.description.notesExplores some of the challenges involved in conducting and evaluating behaviour change programmes for violent men. The first section highlights some of the practical, programmatic and theoretical questions raised by the separation and potential integration of programmes targeting perpetrators of family violence and those targeting perpetrators of other forms of violence. REVAMP, a programme within the correctional system which is provided to the Victorian Department of Justice by the Forensic Psychology Program at Deakin University, Melbourne, for men who are violent domestically or otherwise, is used as an illustration. It is argued that similarities, rather than grounds for division, between generalist and specific programmes should be sought by practitioners. The second section provides an analysis of this overlap from the perspective of an evaluator, again using REVAMP as an example. Some of the major substantive and methodological issues for practitioners conducting programme evaluations are considered, including the use of control groups, measures for evaluating programme efficacy and clearly establishing the purpose and goals of the programme.en
dc.identifier.sourceMen and relationships : partnerships in progress : Sydney, 20-21 November 2000en
dc.date.entered2001-09-25en
dc.publisher.place[Canberra]en
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing