Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/21292
Record ID: f2f6c68a-b215-4abf-8ffc-96711a7837ab
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLabriola, Melissaen
dc.contributor.authorRempel, Michaelen
dc.contributor.authorO'Sullivan, Chrisen
dc.contributor.authorMcDowell, Jimen
dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein, Rachelen
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Phyllisen
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T00:38:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-01T00:38:36Z-
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/21292-
dc.format116 p.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCenter for Court Innovationen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.titleCourt responses to batterer program noncompliance : a national perspectiveen
dc.typeElectronic publicationen
dc.identifier.catalogid4421en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.courtinnovation.org/_uploads/documents/Court_Responses_March2007.pdfen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordElectronic publicationen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.description.notesOverview: This is a detailed report from the US presenting the results of a study examining the potential of batterer programs to achieve the goal of 'accountability' rather than of 'rehabilitation'. The paper states that studies have shown that batterer programs have not achieved significant outcomes in reducing re-occurrence of abusive behaviour, however, the function of accountability has been promoted as a potential outcome.<br/ ><br/ >The study was implemented as a researcher/practitioner partnership, with practitioners leading the framing of research questions and premises. Accountability is understood to be achieved when courts enforce non-compliance in batterer programs by the imposition of meaningful consequences up to and including jail.<br/ ><br/ >Barriers to accountability include the widespread belief that batterer programs have a therapeutic effect and the absence of formal protocols to facilitate enforcement efforts.<en
dc.date.entered2008-09-04en
dc.publisher.placeNew Yorken
dc.description.physicaldescription116 p.en
Appears in Collections:Online resource

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Court_Responses_March2007.pdfCourt_Responses_March2007.pdf557.06 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing