Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22061
Record ID: 3ea0108e-2e75-4b01-888d-97fff423ebb1
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Miller, Christopher J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Adjognon, Omonyêlé L | - |
dc.contributor.author | Brady, Julianne E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dichter, Melissa E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Iverson, Katherine M | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-11T11:08:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-11T11:08:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22061 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a population health problem affecting millions of women worldwide. Screening for IPV within healthcare settings can identify women who experience IPV and inform counseling, referrals, and interventions to improve their health outcomes. Unfortunately, many screening programs used to detect IPV have only been tested in research contexts featuring externally funded study staff and resources. This systematic review therefore investigated the utility of IPV screening administered by frontline clinical personnel.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review focusing on studies of IPV screening programs for women delivered by frontline healthcare staff. We based our data synthesis on two widely used implementation models (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance [RE-AIM] and Proctor's dimensions of implementation effectiveness).ResultsWe extracted data from 59 qualifying studies. Based on data extraction guided by the RE-AIM framework, the median reach of the IPV screening programs was high (80%), but Emergency Department (ED) settings were found to have a much lower reach (47%). The median screen positive rate was 11%, which is comparable to the screen-positive rate found in studies using externally funded research staff. Among those screening positive, a median of 32% received a referral to follow-up services. Based on data extraction guided by Proctor's dimension of appropriateness, a lack of available referral services frustrated some efforts to implement IPV screening. Among studies reporting data on maintenance or sustainability of IPV screening programs, only half concluded that IPV screening rates held steady during the maintenance phase. Other domains of the RE-AIM and Proctor frameworks (e.g., implementation fidelity and costs) were reported less frequently.ConclusionsIPV is a population health issue, and successfully implementing IPV screening programs may be part of the solution. Our review emphasizes the importance of ongoing provider trainings, readily available referral sources, and consistent institutional support in maintaining appropriate IPV screening programs.Plain language abstractIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a population health problem affecting millions of women worldwide. IPV screening and response can identify women who experience IPV and can inform interventions to improve their health outcomes. Unfortunately, many of the screening programs used to detect IPV have only been tested in research contexts featuring administration by externally funded study staff. This systematic review of IPV screening programs for women is particularly novel, as previous reviews have not focused on clinical implementation. It provides a better understanding of successful ways of implementing IPV screening and response practices with frontline clinical personnel in the context of routine care. Successfully implementing IPV screening programs may help mitigate the harms resulting from IPV against women. Findings from this review can inform future efforts to improve implementation of IPV screening programs in clinical settings to ensure that the victims of IPV have access to appropriate counseling, resources, and referrals. | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Implementation Research and Practice | en |
dc.title | Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/26334895211039894 | en |
dc.relation.url | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/26334895211039894 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.