Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22129
Record ID: 3c304618-edd2-482a-9b4e-dd226f4773fd
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEasteal, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorBartels, Lorana-
dc.contributor.authorDodd, Shannon-
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Jessica-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-18T10:39:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-18T10:39:37Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1037-969Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22129-
dc.description.abstractThere has long been concern about the dynamics and inadequacies that may arise when the federal family law system intersects with state and territory civil responses to family violence. We explore the intersection of these two legal regimes in this article. Our findings are part of a larger project examining the Family Violence Act 2016 (ACT) that included interviewing both professional stakeholders and those with lived experience. Findings include a number of ways in which the safety of victim/survivors and their children could be jeopardised (or placed at risk) due to disharmony and communication issues between the two regimes.en_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofAlternative Law Journalen_US
dc.titleA jurisdictional collision? Responses to family violence and family law in the ACTen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1037969X211054217en_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X211054217en_US
Appears in Collections:Book Chapters

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing