Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22129
Record ID: 3c304618-edd2-482a-9b4e-dd226f4773fd
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEasteal, Patriciaen
dc.contributor.authorBartels, Loranaen
dc.contributor.authorDodd, Shannonen
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Jessicaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-18T10:39:37Zen
dc.date.available2022-08-18T10:39:37Zen
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.issn1037-969Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22129en
dc.description.abstractThere has long been concern about the dynamics and inadequacies that may arise when the federal family law system intersects with state and territory civil responses to family violence. We explore the intersection of these two legal regimes in this article. Our findings are part of a larger project examining the Family Violence Act 2016 (ACT) that included interviewing both professional stakeholders and those with lived experience. Findings include a number of ways in which the safety of victim/survivors and their children could be jeopardised (or placed at risk) due to disharmony and communication issues between the two regimes.en
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofAlternative Law Journalen
dc.titleA jurisdictional collision? Responses to family violence and family law in the ACTen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1037969X211054217en
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X211054217en
Appears in Collections:Book Chapters

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing