Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22241
Record ID: 14e68ea2-dee3-4bd5-9904-463db939a445
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKashkooli-Ellat, Jo-leneen
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T03:52:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T03:52:38Z-
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.issn2515-138Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22241-
dc.description.abstractWithin Australia, domestic and family violence has both been recognised as exceedingly pervasive and researched widely from a range of perspectives (Mackay et al., 2015). In recent years, with the intention of reducing the risk of reoffending, the focus has moved from prevention strategies to an emphasis on developing and implementing violence intervention strategies that specifically target known violent offenders. Most historical research has focussed heavily on pathologising perpetrators of violence and on the successful participation of perpetrators in men's behaviour change programmes. Little research attention though has been paid to the training and supervision experiences of facilitators of men's behaviour change. The research reported in this paper explored facilitators' experiences of supervision and training in men's behaviour change programmes (MBCPs) through a qualitative approach, Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. The study was designed to identify how facilitators of MBCPs are supported through ongoing training and clinical supervision to provide best practice while retaining staff, guarding their well-being, and reducing experiences of stress in the workplace. Ten participants from non-government organisations across Western Australia (WA) participated in semi-structured interviews. A six-step qualitative data analysis was utilised to extract findings. These show that, despite the Practice Standards for Perpetrator Intervention (2015), participants consistently noted a substantial lack of clinical supervision and little to no specialised training for facilitators of MBCPs. Further, the findings suggest participants were unaware of well-being strategies for stress prevention in their workplaces.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherPsychregen
dc.subjectPerpetrator interventionsen
dc.subjectMen's behaviour change programsen
dc.subject.otherANROWS e-newsletter February 2023en
dc.titleExploring training and supervision experiences of facilitators of men's behaviour change programmes: A qualitative studyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://www.pjp.psychreg.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/7-jo-lene-kashkooli-ellat-65-77.pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7480642en
dc.identifier.catalogid17670en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS e-newsletter February 2023en
dc.date.entered2023-02-06en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing