Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22275
Record ID: 0b72fbfb-12df-47d9-bbc7-3c7dfd60938f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBatagol, Beckyen
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Heatheren
dc.contributor.authorWangmann, Janeen
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, Francescaen
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Traceyen
dc.contributor.authorSeear, Kateen
dc.contributor.authorKaye, Mirandaen
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T03:55:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T03:55:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 37, Issue 1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22275-
dc.description.abstractThere is increasing recognition that many lawyers, regardless of their practice area, will represent people who have both used and experienced violence in their intimate relationships. This suggests that being informed about domestic and family violence (DFV) is an important attribute of competent lawyering. Despite repeated reports and research drawing attention to poor practices, many lawyers lack DFV training. There is limited research about what it means to be a ‘good’ DFV lawyer. To explore this, we conducted focus groups with lawyers employed in specialist women’s legal services in Australia. Much work undertaken in these services involves working with clients who have experienced DFV, so these lawyers are well placed to identify features of ‘good’ DFV lawyering. The attributes for competent lawyering with people who have experienced DFV, include being knowledgeable about DFV, being trauma-informed/responsive, being knowledgeable about the law and the relevance of violence, adopting a safety lens and providing a holistic service. Our study identifies a number of areas that require further research including understanding the difference between DFV-informed lawyering and trauma-informed/responsive lawyering, and whether specific competencies are required when representing people who experience DFV or have used DFV. Despite years of research and various inquiries pointing to inadequacies and making recommendations for improvement, this article draws attention to continuing gaps in this area.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford Academicen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Law, Policy and the Familyen
dc.titleWhat is ‘good’ domestic violence lawyering?: views from specialist legal services in Australiaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebac034en
dc.identifier.catalogid17634en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.date.entered2023-01-27en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing