Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22285
Record ID: 51ea6cc5-9fa7-49df-9388-c9be7644bdee
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReeves, Ellenen
dc.coverage.spatialVicen
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T03:56:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T03:56:00Z-
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 34, Issue 2en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22285-
dc.description.abstractThe Victorian Royal Commission into Family Violence, in its landmark 2016 report, recommended that in five years – 2021 – the Victorian Government consider expanding police powers to include the ability to grant on-the-spot family violence intervention orders. Such orders would see a bypassing of judicial oversight where deemed appropriate, thus mirroring the Tasmanian model, where police can issue orders for up to 12 months, unless the respondent seeks to have the order varied or revoked in court. There is currently a division in the family violence sector as to the appropriateness of police-issued civil protection orders, with many family violence advocates raising significant concerns. This article considers current debates regarding police-issued civil protection orders and highlights the misidentification of women victim-survivors of family violence as predominant aggressors as a possible unintended consequence of such reform. With the Victorian Government due to respond to Recommendation 59 of the Royal Commission into Family Violence this year, this commentary provides a timely analysis of sector debates and reinforces the potential harms of increasing police powers in a space where they have historically responded poorly.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Issues in Criminal Justiceen
dc.subjectMisidentification of primary aggressoren
dc.titleThe potential introduction of police-issued family violence intervention orders in Victoria, Australia: Considering the unintended consequencesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2021.2021721en
dc.identifier.catalogid17624en
dc.subject.keywordOpen accessen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.readinglistPolicing and legal responsesen
dc.subject.readinglistGeneral populationen
dc.subject.readinglistVicen
dc.description.notes<p>Open access</p>en
dc.date.entered2023-01-27en
dc.subject.anratopicPolicing and legal responsesen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing