Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22703
Record ID: 2badfe72-9a01-44bd-b8c7-da37020d61e0
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGear, Claire-
dc.contributor.authorTing, Chien-
dc.contributor.authorManuel, Carey-
dc.contributor.authorEppel, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorKoziol-McLain, Jane-
dc.coverage.spatialInternational (including Australia)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-19T03:11:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-19T03:11:11Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-
dc.identifier.citationVol 24, Issue 2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22703-
dc.descriptionOpen accessen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract<br> Introduction: Violence within families is a complex problem which significantly impacts health and wellbeing. Despite the ubiquitous call for integrated family violence service delivery, integrated approaches vary significantly and challenges to implementation remain. This scoping review explored how integrated approaches to family violence service delivery are conceptualised within international and Aotearoa New Zealand literature.<br> Methods: Following a documented scoping review process identified from literature, dynamic interplay between system agents within integrated family violence service delivery were mapped with the assistance of a complexity theory lens. We analysed characteristics of included studies, agents involved, how they interacted and the methods and mechanisms of integration among them.<br> Results: Seventy-two published reports were included. The most common interactions occurred between statutory agencies such as police and child protection. While health care service providers were included within 55 studies, their engagement was often peripheral. Qualitative analysis elucidated three broad pathways to service delivery impact underpinned by systems-centred, person-centred, or Indigenous-centred worldviews.<br> Discussion and Conclusion: Integrated approaches to family violence service delivery are highly variable. Despite a strong assumption that integration leads to improved safety, health, and wellbeing for care-seekers, most studies did not include evidence of such impact. Consideration of how worldviews characterise service provision provides insight into why integration has proven challenging over time.en_US
dc.publisherUbiquity Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Integrated Careen_US
dc.subjectDomestic and family violenceen_US
dc.subjectIntegrated Service Deliveryen_US
dc.subjectHealth careen_US
dc.subjectAotearoa New Zelanden_US
dc.subjectChild protection  en_US
dc.subjectPolice, law, courts and/or corrections  en_US
dc.subjectIndigenous issuesen_US
dc.subjectAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplesen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleIntegrated System Responses for Families Impacted by Violence: A Scoping Reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/ijic.7542en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ijic.org/articles/10.5334/ijic.7542en_US
dc.subject.keywordAotearoaen_US
dc.subject.keywordNew Zealanden_US
dc.subject.keywordSystem integrationen_US
dc.subject.keywordService deliveryen_US
dc.subject.keywordHealthcareen_US
dc.subject.keywordHealthcare Servicesen_US
dc.subject.keywordHealth Servicesen_US
dc.subject.keywordHealth Systemsen_US
dc.subject.keywordMedical Servicesen_US
dc.subject.keywordDomestic violenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordFamily violenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordPoliceen_US
dc.subject.keywordComplexity Theoryen_US
dc.subject.keywordChild welfareen_US
dc.subject.keywordScoping reviewen_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Integrated Careen_US
dc.description.contentsIntroduction<br> Overview of family violence as a complex public health problem.<br> Importance of integrated service delivery.<br> <br> Methods<br> Scoping review process and complexity theory lens.<br> Search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria.<br> <br> Results<br> Characteristics of included studies.<br> Common interactions between system agents.<br> Pathways to service delivery impact.<br> <br> Discussion<br> Variability in integrated approaches.<br> Challenges and assumptions in integration.<br> Insights from different worldviews on service provision.<br> <br> Conclusion<br> Summary of findings.<br> Recommendations for future research and policy.<br>en_US
dc.subject.anratopicPrimary preventionen
dc.subject.anratopicChildren and young peopleen_US
dc.subject.anratopicPolicing and legal responsesen_US
dc.subject.anratopicSystems responsesen_US
dc.subject.anratopicTrauma and DFSV-informed, victim-centred systemsen_US
dc.subject.anrapopulationChildren and young peopleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
664c78d850e45-compressed.pdf
  Restricted Access
Report231.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing