Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22754
Record ID: b1b50db6-2f37-48b3-8fe7-46a1bfb126b9
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dioso-Villa, Rachel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nash, Caitlin | - |
dc.coverage.spatial | National | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-12T06:16:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-12T06:16:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-07 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22754 | - |
dc.description | Open access | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study explores the legal outcomes for women in Australia who have killed an abusive partner during a violent confrontation, focusing on factors that contribute to successful self-defence claims or result in criminal convictions. The research examines 32 cases between 2010 and 2023, highlighting the pivotal role of "evidentiary checkpoints" during trials that may lead to the downgrading or withdrawal of murder charges. Key findings reveal that women are often overcharged, with many pleading guilty to manslaughter despite potential self-defence claims. The study underscores the systemic disadvantages faced by Indigenous women and the strategic importance of private legal representation. The research calls for comprehensive legal reforms to better support women who kill in response to domestic abuse, particularly in contexts where their actions are framed as self-defence. | en_US |
dc.publisher | International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy | en_US |
dc.subject | Intimate Partner Homicide (IPH) | en_US |
dc.subject | Domestic and Family Violence | en_US |
dc.subject | Intimate Partner Violence | en_US |
dc.subject | Gender and Justice | en_US |
dc.title | Identifying evidentiary checkpoints and strategies to support successful acquittals for women who kill an abusive partner during a violent confrontation | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.3538 | en_US |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/3538 | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Self-Defence | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Legal Representation | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Miscarriages of Justice | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Indigenous Women | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Legal Pathways in Self-Defence | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Partial Defences | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Battered Women Syndrome | en_US |
dc.subject.anratopic | Gender relations, gender norms and attitudes | en_US |
dc.subject.anratopic | Legal and justice responses | en_US |
dc.subject.anratopic | Structural inequities | en_US |
dc.subject.anratopic | Systems responses | en_US |
dc.subject.anrapopulation | Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples | en_US |
dc.identifier.bibtype | Journal article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
3538-Article Text-13677-1-10-20240726.pdf | 1.03 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.