Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22754
Record ID: b1b50db6-2f37-48b3-8fe7-46a1bfb126b9
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDioso-Villa, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorNash, Caitlin-
dc.coverage.spatialNationalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T06:16:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-12T06:16:28Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22754-
dc.descriptionOpen accessen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the legal outcomes for women in Australia who have killed an abusive partner during a violent confrontation, focusing on factors that contribute to successful self-defence claims or result in criminal convictions. The research examines 32 cases between 2010 and 2023, highlighting the pivotal role of "evidentiary checkpoints" during trials that may lead to the downgrading or withdrawal of murder charges. Key findings reveal that women are often overcharged, with many pleading guilty to manslaughter despite potential self-defence claims. The study underscores the systemic disadvantages faced by Indigenous women and the strategic importance of private legal representation. The research calls for comprehensive legal reforms to better support women who kill in response to domestic abuse, particularly in contexts where their actions are framed as self-defence.en_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracyen_US
dc.subjectIntimate Partner Homicide (IPH)en_US
dc.subjectDomestic and Family Violenceen_US
dc.subjectIntimate Partner Violenceen_US
dc.subjectGender and Justiceen_US
dc.titleIdentifying evidentiary checkpoints and strategies to support successful acquittals for women who kill an abusive partner during a violent confrontationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.3538en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/3538en_US
dc.subject.keywordSelf-Defenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordLegal Representationen_US
dc.subject.keywordMiscarriages of Justiceen_US
dc.subject.keywordIndigenous Womenen_US
dc.subject.keywordLegal Pathways in Self-Defenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordPartial Defencesen_US
dc.subject.keywordBattered Women Syndromeen_US
dc.subject.anratopicGender relations, gender norms and attitudesen_US
dc.subject.anratopicLegal and justice responsesen_US
dc.subject.anratopicStructural inequitiesen_US
dc.subject.anratopicSystems responsesen_US
dc.subject.anrapopulationAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplesen_US
dc.identifier.bibtypeJournal articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
3538-Article Text-13677-1-10-20240726.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing