Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22768
Record ID: 9e612e0e-68bf-485c-8d33-c093436a08a7
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSharman, Leah S.-
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Robin-
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Heather-
dc.coverage.spatialInternational (including Australia)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-16T01:11:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-16T01:11:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.citation13:e072077en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22768-
dc.descriptionOpen accessen_US
dc.description.abstractThis scoping review investigates the role of medical evidence in supporting the prosecution of non-fatal strangulation (NFS) cases, a serious form of gendered violence that often leaves little to no externally visible injuries, complicating prosecution efforts. The review synthesizes findings from 25 studies focused on how health professionals can assist in the legal prosecution of NFS through clinical documentation and medical investigations. The review highlights the importance of using tools like alternate light sources (ALS) for detecting intradermal injuries, MRI scans for internal injuries, and standardized documentation practices to corroborate victim testimonies and increase the likelihood of successful legal outcomes.en_US
dc.publisherBMJ Journalsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Openen_US
dc.subjectStrangulationen_US
dc.subjectGender-Based Violenceen_US
dc.subjectNon-Fatal Strangulation (NFS)en_US
dc.subjectDomestic and Family Violenceen_US
dc.subjectCriminal Justice Systemen_US
dc.subjectVictim Support Servicesen_US
dc.titleMedical evidence assisting non-fatal strangulation prosecution: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2023-072077en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/3/e072077.infoen_US
dc.subject.keywordNon-Fatal Strangulation (NFS)en_US
dc.subject.keywordChokingen_US
dc.subject.keywordLegal Proceedingsen_US
dc.subject.keywordMedical Evidenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordProsecutionen_US
dc.subject.keywordForensic documentationen_US
dc.subject.keywordForensic assessmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordStrangulation detectionen_US
dc.subject.keywordClinical documentationen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBMJ Openen_US
dc.description.contents<strong>Objectives</strong><br> Non-fatal strangulation (NFS) is a serious form of gendered violence that is fast becoming an offence in many jurisdictions worldwide. However, it often leaves little or no externally visible injuries, making prosecution challenging. This review aimed to provide an overview of how health professionals can support the prosecution of criminal charges of NFS as part of regular practice, particularly when externally visible injuries are absent.<br><br> <strong>Method</strong><br> Eleven databases were searched with terms related to NFS and medical evidence in health sciences and legal databases. Eligible articles were English language and peer-reviewed, published before 30 June 2021; sample over 18 years that had primarily survived a strangulation attempt and included medical investigations of NFS injuries, clinical documentation of NFS, or medical evidence related to NFS prosecution.<br><br> <strong>Results</strong><br> Searches found 25 articles that were included for review. Alternate light sources appeared to be the most effective tool for finding evidence of intradermal injury among NFS survivors that were not otherwise visible. However, there was only one article that examined the utility of this tool. Other common diagnostic imaging was less effective at detection but was sought after by prosecutors, particularly MRIs of the head and neck. Recording injuries and other aspects of the assault using standardised tools specific for NFS were suggested for documenting evidence. Other documentation included writing verbatim quotes of the experience of the assault and taking good quality photographs that could assist with corroborating a survivor’s story and proving intent if relevant for the jurisdiction.<br><br> <strong>Conclusion</strong><br> Clinical responses to NFS should include investigation and standardised documentation of internal and external injuries, subjective complaints, and the experience of the assault. These records can assist in providing corroborating evidence of the assault, reducing the need for survivor testimony in court proceedings, and increasing the likelihood of a guilty plea.en_US
dc.identifier.bibtypeJournal articleen_US
Appears in Collections:ANROWS Completed Register of Active Research projects
Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
e072077.full (1).pdf773.13 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing