Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/11276
Record ID: a23caf83-9ff0-4ae9-afb1-52d8bf00cf0e
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Gitteen
dc.contributor.authorLavack, Anne Men
dc.contributor.authorCismaru, Magdalenaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T22:46:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T22:46:31Z-
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/11276-
dc.languageenen
dc.subjectMarketingen
dc.subjectDomestic violenceen
dc.subjectEvaluationsen
dc.subjectBystander interventionen
dc.titleBystander intervention in domestic violence : evaluating social marketing campaignsen
dc.typeBook Chapteren
dc.identifier.catalogid14544en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-50008-9_221en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notes"Bystanders play a significant role when it comes to reporting the incidents to authorities, but are often hesitant to get involved in domestic disputes. In this paper, 11 social marketing campaigns that encourage bystander intervention against domestic violence are evaluated in relation to Latané and Darley's (1970) model of the bystander decision making process. The evaluation shows that these social marketing campaigns are sometimes contradictory or ambiguous, which may limit their effectiveness."en
dc.date.entered2017-01-24en
Appears in Collections:Book Chapters

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing