Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12256
Record ID: 41053119-ff09-4d8d-9787-961140430496
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2005.09.005
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2005.09.005
Electronic Resource Number:
Synopsis Feminist theories remain influential in explaining intimate violence between adults, however there has been limited feminist focus on intimate violence in young people's relationships, or ‘dating violence’ as it is commonly termed. Psychological explanations, particularly social learning and attachment theories, have predominated in dating violence research, which has not taken account of structural factors constraining and influencing young people's actions. This study of young people draws together feminist theories in the areas of sexuality, gender relations and gendered violence. The study is a detailed analysis of the micro-practices of heterosexuality from young people's interviews which illuminates gendered power relations and practices of inequality and violence. The findings suggest that gender inequality and intimate violence are common in young people's dating relationships. The study demonstrates that the discourses of heterosexuality, in combination with discourses of individualism and equality, are influential in how young people make meaning of their relationship experiences and understand intimate violence.
Web resource: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539505000828
Type: Journal Article
Title: Violence, control, romance and gender equality: Young women and heterosexual relationships
Other Titles: Women's Studies International Forum
Authors: Chung, Donna
Year: 2005
Citation: No 6 Vol.: 28
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12256
ISSN: 0277-5395
Physical description: Pages 445-455
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing