Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12295
Record ID: 73505204-c43a-4827-a882-0b968f4f0cf0
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Working with domestic violence: ethical dilemmas in five theoretical approaches |
Other Titles: | The Australian and New Zealand journal of family therapy |
Authors: | Hunter, Sally |
Keywords: | Theories of violence;Counselling |
Year: | 2001 |
Publisher: | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy |
Citation: | 22 (2), June 2001 |
Notes: | Evaluates five different theoretical approaches to working therapeutically with victims of domestic violence, in terms of their capacity to adhere to ethical principles of respect for client autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. These principles are defined and the major differences between a person-centred, feminist, Milan systemic, post-Milan feminist systemic and narrative ‘invitation to responsibility’ approach are outlined. The primary ethical dilemma which arises in the context of each approach is then discussed as is the inverse relationship between respect for autonomy and beneficence and non-maleficence. It is argued that an awareness of one’s own position is essential to ethical and effective practice in this field and that greater emphasis should be placed on the development of a strong professional infrastructure which provides training, support and continuing education to counsellors and therapists. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12295 |
ISSN: | 0814-723X |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.