Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12316
Record ID: b4206f0d-d1f0-4335-961e-efe243be47b8
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Test-retest reliability of the revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) |
Other Titles: | Journal of family violence |
Authors: | Vega, Edward M O'Leary, Daniel |
Keywords: | Measurement;Perpetrators |
Year: | 2007 |
Publisher: | Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers |
Citation: | 22 (8), November 2007 |
Notes: | The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) are widely used to measure intimate partner aggression. Various aspects of the CTS2 and its subscales have been examined, e.g. factor structure, internal consistency, and validity, but little or no evidence exists regarding the stability of the self-report of aggression on the CTS2 This study examines the stability of reports of aggression against a partner on the CTS2 among 82 men court-mandated to a batterer intervention program. At both testing times men reported on aggression occurring in the year prior to beginning treatment. Using variety scores, stability of report was strong for psychological aggression (r = 0.69), physical assault (r = 0.76), injury (r = 0.70), and negotiation (r = 0.60), but weaker for sexual coercion (r = 0.30). Implications for the use of the CTS2 in court-mandated populations are discussed. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12316 |
ISSN: | 0885-7482 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.