Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12350
Record ID: 4f42a1e3-0146-4381-92ef-4be6f2b11d0e
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Violent acts and injurious consequences: an examination of competing hypotheses about intimate partner violence using agency-based data |
Other Titles: | Journal of family violence |
Authors: | Warner, Tara D |
Keywords: | Theories of violence |
Year: | 2010 |
Publisher: | Springer Publishing |
Citation: | 25 (2), February 2010 |
Notes: | The current study proposed and tested a series of competing hypotheses about intimate partner violence in the 2006 National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS), a dataset of criminal incidents known to the police. Three research questions were presented concerning gender differences in victim identity, victim-offender relationships, and victim injury with hypotheses derived from the feminist, family violence, and general violence perspectives. Victim-based analyses were consistent primarily with expectations of the feminist perspective, although aspects of the general violence perspective were supported as well: Women were more likely than men to experience violence from an intimate; they were more likely to experience violence from an intimate partner than from any other perpetrator; and when victimized by an intimate, women were usually more likely to be injured. These results highlight the uniqueness of violence between intimates relative to other types of violence. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12350 |
ISSN: | 0885-7482 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.