Electronic Resources:	http://sirius.library.unsw.edu.au:9003/sfx_local?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ%3Acriminaljusticeperiodicalsshell&atitle=The+Good+Lives+Model+%28GLM%29+in+Theory+and+Practice&title=Sexual+Abuse+in+Australia+and+New+Zealand&issn=18338488&date=2013-05-01&volume=5&issue=1&spage=3&au=Willis%2C+Gwenda+M%3BPrescott%2C+David+S%3BYates%2C+Pamela+M&isbn=&jtitle=Sexual+Abuse+in+Au[cut]
Web resource:	https://search.proquest.com/docview/1355441811?accountid=12763
Type:	Journal Article
Title:	The Good Lives Model (GLM) in Theory and Practice
Other Titles:	Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand
Authors:	Willis, Gwenda M Yates, Pamela M Prescott, David S
Year:	2013
Publisher:	Australia and New Zealand Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abuse (A NZATS A)
Citation:	No 1 Vol.: 5
Notes:	The Good Lives Model (GLM) is a strengths-based rehabilitation theory that augments the risk, need, and responsivity principles of effective correctional intervention through its focus on assisting clients to develop and implement meaningful life plans that are incompatible with future offending. During the decade of its existence, the GLM has seen advances in its underlying theory and application, as well as in its popularity, although empirical support for its application in practice remains in its infancy. This article briefly reviews the evolution of the application of the GLM, describes new and more accessible terminology for key GLM constructs, and offers ideas for situating traditional treatment programme components within the GLM framework. This brief article is intended to provide a summary of recent developments from existing texts on the application of the GLM. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Copyright - Copyright Australia and New Zealand Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abuse (A NZATS A) May 2013Document feature - Tables; ReferencesLast updated - 2013-06-18ReferencesAndrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphey, W., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2011). Desistance and sex offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117-146Marshall, W. L. (2005). Therapist Style in Sexual Offender Treatment: Influence on Indices of Change. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 109-116.McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G., Burchard, B., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American survey. Brandon, Vermont: Safer Society Press.Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 6-21.Prescott, D. S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: An update for professionals working with people who have sexually abused. The Forum, Newsletter of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA), 25, 1-9.Purvis, M. (2010). Seeking a good life: Human goods and sexual offending. Germany: Lambert Academic Press.Simons, D. A., McCullar, B., & Tyler, C. (2006). Evaluation of the Good Lives Model approach to treatment planning. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers Research and Treatment Conference, Chicago, Illinois.Ward, T. (2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 513-528.Ward, T., & Gannon, T. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive Good Lives Model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 77-94.Ward, T., Mann, R. E., & Gannon, T. A. (2007). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 87-107.Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk assessment paradigm. London, UK: Routledge.Ward, T., & Stewart, C. A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 353-360.Ward, T., Yates, P. M., & Long, C. A. (2006). The Self-Regulation Model of the Offence and Relapse Process, Volume II: Treatment. Victoria, BC: Pacific Psychological Assessment Corporation. Available at www.pacific-psych.com.Ward, T., Yates, P. M., & Willis, G. M. (2012). The Good Lives Model and the Risk Need Responsivity Model: A critical response to Andrews, Bonta, and Wormith (2011). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 94-110.Ware, J., & Mann, R. E. (2012). How should "acceptance of responsibility" be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 279-288.Willis, G. M., Ward, T., & Levenson, J. S. (in press). The Good Lives Model (GLM): An evaluation of GLM operationalization in North American treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment.Willis, G. M., & Yates, P. (2012).[cut]
URI:	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12914
ISSN:	18338488
Physical description:	Pages 3-9
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.