Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13065
Record ID: c7638455-7945-4e7f-9c84-032e98032ff3
Type: Journal Article
Title: A comparison of four batterer intervention systems: do court referral, program length, and services matter?
Other Titles: Journal of interpersonal violence
Authors: Gondolf, Edward W
Keywords: Perpetrator programs;Perpetrators
Year: 1999
Publisher: Sage Publications
Citation: 14 (1), January 1999
Notes:  Outlines the methodology and results of a comparative multi-site evaluation, conducted in four US cities, aimed at ascertaining the relative effectiveness, in terms of re-assault rates, of different perpetrator programmes. Major variables identified were differences in court referral procedures (pre-trial or post-conviction), differences in programme duration and the un/availability of additional services such as in-house alcohol treatment. Although the study found close to equivalent re-assault rates across each site, it is argued that these results do not necessarily support arguments for brief therapy and managed care. Emphasising the importance of the context in which a service is delivered and the adaptation of programmes to their particular locale, suggestions for future research, practice and policy are made.
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13065
ISSN: 0886-2605
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing