Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13126 Record ID: cfe21d4b-493b-41af-ba9b-189c03d8a280
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Bradley, Sarah | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Rempel, Michael | en |
| dc.contributor.author | O'Sullivan, Chris | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Labriola, Melissa | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Moore, Samantha | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:04:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:04:27Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13126 | - |
| dc.format | 146 p. | en |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Center for Court Innovation | en |
| dc.subject | Legal issues | en |
| dc.subject | Service provision | en |
| dc.subject | Criminal justice responses | en |
| dc.subject | Specialist courts | en |
| dc.title | A national portrait of domestic violence courts | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 5905 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.courtinnovation.org/_uploads/documents/national_portrait.pdf | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Electronic publication | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
| dc.description.notes | General Overview: This study explores the evolution, rationale and operation of domestic violence courts in the United States. It provides a comprehensive picture of the 208 confirmed domestic violence courts (i.e. courts with a specialised domestic violence calendar or dedicated judge) across the country.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion: The study used a mixed methods design, with the research undertaken in four main stages: the compilation of a compendium of courts; site visits to fifteen courts in five states (California, Florida, Illinois, New York and Washington); a national survey; and phone interviews with a subsample from the survey.<br/ ><br/ >The researchers found that there was a strong focus on the objectives of victim safety and offender accountability across the courts, despite significant variations in policies and protocols. Courts were less consistent in the priority given to efficiency in case processing, correct application of state legislation, and offender rehabilitation. | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2010-09-29 | en |
| dc.publisher.place | New York | en |
| dc.description.physicaldescription | 146 p. | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| national_portrait.pdf | national_portrait.pdf | 557.22 kB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.