Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13127
Record ID: 0402e9b3-6239-4d01-9a53-f3cd1d3b66d0
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | A nationwide survey of state-mandated evaluation practices for domestic violence agencies |
Other Titles: | Journal of interpersonal violence |
Authors: | Staggs, Susan L Riger, Stephanie |
Keywords: | Measurement;Counselling;Service provision |
Year: | 2011 |
Publisher: | Sage Publications |
Citation: | 26 (1), January 2011 |
Notes: | Many [US] agencies serving survivors of domestic violence are required to evaluate their services. Three possible evaluation strategies include: a) process measurement, which typically involves a frequency count of agency activities, such as the number of counseling hours given; b) outcome evaluation, which measures the impact of agency activities on clients, such as increased understanding of the dynamics of abuse; or c) performance measurement, which assesses the extent to which agencies achieve their stated goals. Findings of a telephone survey of state funders of domestic violence agencies in the United States revealed that most states (67%) require only process measurement, while fewer than 10% require performance measurement. Most (69%) funders reported satisfaction with their evaluation strategy and emphasized the need for involvement of all stakeholders, especially grantees, in developing an evaluation. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13127 |
ISSN: | 0886-2605 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.