Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13127
Record ID: 0402e9b3-6239-4d01-9a53-f3cd1d3b66d0
Type: Journal Article
Title: A nationwide survey of state-mandated evaluation practices for domestic violence agencies
Other Titles: Journal of interpersonal violence
Authors: Staggs, Susan L
Riger, Stephanie
Keywords: Measurement;Counselling;Service provision
Year: 2011
Publisher: Sage Publications
Citation: 26 (1), January 2011
Notes:  Many [US] agencies serving survivors of domestic violence are required to evaluate their services. Three possible evaluation strategies include: a) process measurement, which typically involves a frequency count of agency activities, such as the number of counseling hours given; b) outcome evaluation, which measures the impact of agency activities on clients, such as increased understanding of the dynamics of abuse; or c) performance measurement, which assesses the extent to which agencies achieve their stated goals. Findings of a telephone survey of state funders of domestic violence agencies in the United States revealed that most states (67%) require only process measurement, while fewer than 10% require performance measurement. Most (69%) funders reported satisfaction with their evaluation strategy and emphasized the need for involvement of all stakeholders, especially grantees, in developing an evaluation.

[?2009 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit SAGE Publications link.]
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13127
ISSN: 0886-2605
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing